Tag Archive for 'iphone'

Peek Constructive Critique

Peek is simple device that only sends and receives email, the whole device is made for email only. The device is priced at $100 USD and requires a $20 USD month plan for access to the mobile data network. It’s been along time since I’ve seen an attempt to sell a device that only does one thing, the only other device that used to be successful was the mobile phone not any more. Before I start my constructive critique of the device I just want to make the fact that this is not an iPhone do not compared it to an iPhone the two are very different devices.

I like the effort and concept but can’t help but feel the device falls short of it’s immense potential. First of all the monthly plan exceeds what an individual would pay for email only it just doesn’t make sense. Perhaps it’s out of the makers will but the appropriate monthly cost should be $10 to $12 USD. The $20 USD monthly play would be justified if the device integrated a web browser and optionally something like or Google earth.

OK, I get it it’s a text device then either IM or text messaging should be an option. People would have no problem paying an extra $4 USD a month for a fair amount of messages each month.

May Peek Inc should have pick up where Palm left and integrate an organizer and contacts application. Although the Peek currently provides a fraction of the features I do not feel it’s a unified integration. Would it be lame to consider Google Apps.

It may be too early but the Peek might have a change, it’s not meant to a smart phone by any means. The lack of a web browser makes me doubt it will last more than two years in the market. Aimed at the non techies , gives me little confidence in the company future plans to improve the device and add new features.

If you find any of the material on this site useful please take a moment to make a small donation.

Apple Kill Switch Belongs Inside The Corporate World

Remote kill switch abilities are usually found in the smart phones the corporate world uses, this feature is usually necessary because loosing company related data is never a good thing. I understand that an employer has the right to enforce what ever policies it wants on it’s employees because they previously agreed to the company rules and policies provided. The all too common Internet filtering is one example. That’s why I find the idea (now a concrete one) that Apple had the audacity to implement such a feature in the iPhone. Both Apple and AT&T are being paid for the service and device they are giving nothing away for free. Customers are customers not employees they are not corporate employees.

Apple’s defense for the kill switch is that of a company who argues it knows best how to protect the mobile platform from malicious software. This is Apple’s anti-virus. So far it looks like an invasion and abuse from Apple toward the user’s. Perhaps if they took the time to make this clear instead of just remotely killing an application without an explanation I would not be mad.

If you find any of the material on this site useful please take a moment to make a small donation.